Specifically, the piling that is used in the construction of foundation is still an important part of the entire process of construction of buildings, bridges and other constructions. Piles are deep foundations through which loading of a structure is distributed to denser soil or rocks beneath the surface of the structure. There are various types of piling methods, each with its own advantages and disadvantages, and two of the most commonly used methods are Continuous Flight Auger (CFA) piles and driven piles.
In this blog, we will explore what CFA piles and driven piles are, how they are installed, their advantages and disadvantages, and the situations where each type of piling is best suited. CJB Piling offers expertise in both techniques to help you determine the most suitable foundation solution for your project.
What Are CFA Piles?
Continual Flight Auger piles are a subtype of bored piles – constructed by cased bored drilling with a specially designed continuous flight auger that discharges the soil as it progresses. As it is pushed deeper into the ground, the auger is brought round continually. When the depth is attained the cutting tool is drawn out and, in its place, concrete is placed into the hole created by the auger. The concrete is usually mixed with a pump, allowing it to flow smoothly into the pile as the auger is removed.
CFA piles are often used in situations where the soil is relatively soft or where there is a risk of causing damage to surrounding structures. The continuous flight auger allows for the pile to be installed with minimal disturbance to the surrounding area, making it ideal for sites with limited space or in urban environments.
What Are Driven Piles?
Drives piles, on the other hand, are long cylindrical column fashioned either of concrete, steel or timber, which is hammered into the ground by a pile driver. The pile is hammered into the ground until it reaches a suitable depth, usually through the use of a heavy weight or a mechanical device that delivers high-impact blows to the top of the pile. Such piles are mostly used where deeper footing is needed so as in case of areas that have hard or compact soils.
Unlike CFA piles, driven piles do not involve drilling or boring into the ground. Instead, they are mechanically forced into position and are then able to distribute the weight of the structure down towards a less mobile level of soil or bedrock.
Key Differences Between CFA Piles and Driven Piles
Installation Method
A major difference on the two types of piles is in the method of implementation; CFA piles and driven piles. CFA piles are drilled into the ground using an auger, whereas driven piles are physically hammered into the ground. The drilling method used in CFA piling creates a cylindrical hole that is filled with concrete, while driven piles are pre-formed and driven into the ground, transferring their load directly to the soil.
Noise and Vibration
Driven piles typically generate significant noise and vibrations during installation, as the pile driver uses impact to drive the pile into the ground. This can be problematic in urban areas or near sensitive structures, as it can lead to damage or disturbance to surrounding buildings. CFA piles, on the other hand, produce much less noise and vibration because they rely on drilling and concrete pouring, making them a quieter and less disruptive option for construction sites located in residential or busy urban areas.
Soil Conditions
CFA piles are generally used in soils that are softer or where the ground conditions are more cohesive. This is because the auger can easily remove soil as it drills, and the concrete is poured into the hole to create a strong foundation. However, CFA piling can be less effective in extremely hard or dense soils, as the auger may struggle to penetrate the ground.
Driven piles, by contrast, are more suitable for dense or hard soils where drilling methods might not be as effective. Since driven piles are hammered into place, they can be used in a wider range of soil conditions, including those with compacted or rocky layers.
Speed and Efficiency
CFA piles can generally be installed more quickly than driven piles, especially in softer soil conditions. The continuous flight auger method allows for faster installation, as there is no need for heavy machinery to repeatedly impact the pile into the ground. Additionally, the pouring of concrete while the auger is being withdrawn can save time.
In contrast, the installation of driven piles is slower due to the need for a pile driver and the impact-driven process. The pile must be driven deeper into the ground with each blow, which can take longer, especially in challenging soil conditions.
Pile Integrity
The integrity of the pile is also an important consideration. CFA piles tend to have a smooth, continuous concrete shaft, which can result in better load distribution and less risk of damage during installation. On the other hand, driven piles are subject to greater forces during installation, which can sometimes cause damage to the pile, particularly if it is made of concrete. However, driven piles have the advantage of being able to reach deeper and more stable layers of soil, which can result in a stronger foundation.
Advantages and Disadvantages of CFA Piles and Driven Piles
Advantages of CFA Piles:
Minimal Noise and Vibration: CFA piles are quieter and less disruptive, making them ideal for use in urban and residential areas.
Faster Installation: The continuous flight auger method allows for quicker pile installation, especially in soft soil conditions.
Reduced Ground Disturbance: The drilling method minimizes ground displacement, reducing the risk of damage to surrounding structures.
Disadvantages of CFA Piles:
Limited Use in Hard Soils: CFA piles are not ideal for use in dense or rocky soils, as the auger may struggle to penetrate the ground.
Cost: CFA piles can be more expensive to install in some cases, especially in challenging soil conditions.
Advantages of Driven Piles:
Suitable for Hard Soil Conditions: Driven piles are effective in dense or hard soils, making them suitable for deeper foundations.
Durability: Driven piles are typically more durable and can withstand high levels of pressure and impact.
Disadvantages of Driven Piles:
Noise and Vibration: The installation process generates significant noise and vibrations, which can be disruptive in urban or residential areas.
Slower Installation: Driven piles tend to take longer to install compared to CFA piles, particularly in difficult ground conditions.
Conclusion
Both CFA piles and driven piles have their advantages and disadvantages, and the choice between the two depends largely on the soil conditions, project requirements, and environmental considerations. CFA piles are ideal for projects in urban environments where noise and vibration need to be minimized, while driven piles are best suited for situations where deeper foundations are required, particularly in hard or dense soil conditions.
Table of Contents